Another scenario is a strong centralization of power as a threat to the people s government after a long term military conflict with Russia, China or Iran. Published in Bernt s blog by Bernt Hagtvet Monday January, last updated Monday. Bernt Hagtvet Professor Mayhew, you have spent all your time at Yale studying the American political system. Nowadays, the media is full of predictions about the coming collapse of American democracy. How would you, as a political scientist, comment on such statements DH.
David Mayhew Collapse I doubt whether we are facing a collapse We see a good deal of polarization, but the public in the US does not have much sense of extremism. The constitution in the USA is quite good at preventing and weakening conflicts. The law was constructed precisely whatsapp mobile number list for that in the th century. Read James Madison The individual states, not to mention the cities, generally have wide political room for action. Checks and balance arrangements are also in place at federal level. Everyone knows that control of Congress routinely rotates between the parties, and that winning the next election is the best solution to political discord.
It is not necessary to think about this in detail. If I lose the next election, it means the end of democracy This term is an all too easy way of expressing oneself in the chattering classes the chattering classes i.e. the commentary, BH. If one were to imagine a breakdown. How could one imagine a scenario in that direction. The term collapse is a metaphor, and such mental images can easily lead us down a wild path and become misleading. Words like erosion and weathering also sound familiar to me yes, there are eight full characters. Trust in American political institutions is at an all low level, and polarization in the sense of distance between the parties is at an all time high.